TheReviewMonk is back — critic reviews for Indian cinema, aggregated. Read our story →

TheReviewMonk
“Wuthering Heights” backdrop

“Wuthering Heights”

11 February 2026English2h 16m
out of 10
Mixedlukewarm or divided
Monk Score · 6 scored reviews · 6 not rated

Visually lavish but passionless, Fennell's Brontë loses the soul it dresses so well.

Verdict tier Mixed, lukewarm or divided, on a scale of Unfavorable, Mixed, Recommended, Exceptional.

  • Praised: Lush, striking visual beauty
  • Criticised: Lacking emotional depth and passion

Audience

No user ratings yet.

Critic consensus

What 12 critics are saying

Critical reception for Emerald Fennell's Wuthering Heights is largely divided, with the majority of reviewers finding the film visually sumptuous but emotionally hollow. The film's lush cinematography and visual craftsmanship are the most consistently acknowledged strengths across reviews. However, critics frequently charge the adaptation with oversimplifying Brontë's source material, with the central romance widely described as failing to generate genuine passion or emotional depth despite its explicit content. A recurring criticism is that the film prioritises surface aesthetics and shock value over substantive character and narrative.

How the 6 scores spread

6 not-rated reviews aren't plotted

Positive / mixed / negative reviews

Positive = 6.5/10 and up · negative = below 5/10

AI-generated summary of 12 critic reviews · may contain errors

Report inaccuracy

From the papers

Critic reviews (12)

Top critics first, then by score · not-rated last · updated

  1. Top critic

    Indian Express

    Film review

    You may be left wondering as the Emily Brontë classic about an obsessive-destructive love and hate relationship is repurposed as an overwrought, oversexualised, oversimplified Valentine's Day release. Instead, Fennell is focused on shocking, titillating, obsessing with textures and surfaces and liquids, and impressing with the film's unquestionably visual lushness, but for all their secret, fervid encounters, Robbie and Elordi hardly set the windy, wet, bleak Wuthering Heights on fire.
  2. Filmfare

    Film review

    Wuthering Heights can be a compelling, engaging watch for those who have the appetite for a 'ever-so-slight-amount' of depravity in their romance. Director Emerald Fennell creates a visual scape that creates images of the characters' feelings, evoking specific reactions and setting the mood for exactly what the characters are feeling.
  3. Rediff

    Film review

    Marketed as a Valentine's Day treat, audiences can expect to be mildly entertained by the surface-level intimate scenes in Wuthering Heights that only leave you thirsty for the real, raw passion. If you grew up reading and dissecting the novel, you may be disappointed to know that Fennel doesn't do justice to the rich layering, ambiguity and interpretation of the character arc in the original.
  4. India Today

    Film review

    Emerald Fennell's Wuthering Heights adaptation struggles to capture the novel's emotional depth. The film's central romance fails to ignite, leaving audiences detached and unengaged.
  5. Hindustan Times

    Film review

    The new adaptation, directed by Academy Award-winner Emerald Fennell, demands obedience. In doing so, it commits the error not only of discarding the gigantic obligation of adaptation but also of making an utter mess of it.
  6. Deccan Chronicle

    Film review

    Yet for all the big swings, Fennell's "Wuthering Heights" amounts to something oddly shallow and blunt: garish and stylized fan fiction with the scope and budget of an old-school Hollywood epic. In these sex-deprived times at the cinema, if some corset kink, power games and smoldering star power from two genetically blessed Australians is what you're looking for, "Wuthering Heights" might just satisfy that big-screen itch, but the surreal, pop art choices are often more distracting than additive.
  7. Firstpost

    Film review

    Not much inspired from the novel, Margot Robbie, Jacob Elordi starrer film draws a fine line between a love story and an erotica.
  8. The Atlantic

    Film review ·

    Wuthering Heights, the writer-director Emerald Fennell's new adaptation of Emily Brontë's groundbreaking Gothic novel, is her best film to date—a heaving, rip-snortingly carnal good time at the cinema. It is also a gooey, grimy mess. Fennell has streamlined the book's narrative, yes, but not its white-hot melodramatic core—and she understands it well enough to create a worthy swoon-fest for the ages.
  9. The Hindu

    Film review

    A phenomenally loose adaptation of Emily Brontë's 1847 novel, Wuthering Heights is eye‑wateringly beautiful to look at and sounds exquisite but is ultimately rather hollow. For all the sweaty couplings in the film, Wuthering Heights is strangely without heat. Even if you remove Brontë from the mix, the tragedy of Wuthering Heights is, it does not stand very well on its own.
  10. TheGuardian

    Film review ·

    Wuthering Heights doesn't have the live-ammo impact of Fennell's earlier films Saltburn and Promising Young Woman or, indeed, Andrea Arnold's flawed, brilliant, primitivist take on Brontë's novel from 2011, which really did believe in the passionate truth of Cathy and Heathcliff's love. For Fennell, it looks like a luxurious pose of unserious abandon. It's quasi-erotic, pseudo-romantic and then ersatz-sad, a club night of mock emotion.
  11. TheNation

    Film review ·

    Fennell's 'Wuthering Heights' is attuned to our present moment, in which shock and awe undermine history, fashion prevails over depth, and the moody score threatens to overwhelm the foreground. It is a film made for the age of TikTok and Instagram, a movie composed for the algorithm, with flashy and catchy images but little substance.

Credits

Cast & crew

Cast

You may also like

English films like “Wuthering Heights”

TMDB

This product uses the TMDB API but is not endorsed or certified by TMDB.